Iran Holocaust

Hijab law in Iran

The history of compulsory hijab in Iran (1979–2026): Article 638 of the Penal Code, the 2023 Chastity & Hijab Bill, the 2024 Noor Plan, and the women resisting them.

Law · compulsory veiling · 1979–2026

Iran's hijab law.

Compulsory veiling has been enshrined in Iranian law since 1983. The 2023–2024 Chastity & Hijab Bill expanded penalties to include fines of US$8,500, ten-year prison terms, flogging, and travel bans. This page tracks the law, its enforcement, and the women resisting it.

When did Iran make hijab compulsory?

On 7 March 1979, less than a month after the revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini decreed that women in government workplaces had to wear hijab. Mass women's protests in Tehran on 8 March 1979 — International Women's Day — temporarily forced a retreat. By July 1980 hijab was mandatory in all public offices, and on 26 July 1983 the new Islamic Penal Code (Article 102, later Article 638) criminalised any woman appearing in public "without proper hijab".

What does the current law say?

Article 638 of Iran's Islamic Penal Code prescribes imprisonment of 10 days to 2 months or a fine for women appearing in public "without a hijab that is in accordance with sharia". In practice enforcement also draws on Article 639 (corrupting public morals), business-licensing regulations, and traffic codes used to impound cars whose female occupants are unveiled.

What is the 2023 Chastity & Hijab Bill?

Approved by the Guardian Council in September 2024 but suspended by the Supreme National Security Council in December 2024 before it took effect, the Chastity & Hijab Bill escalates penalties for "improper hijab" to:

  • Fines up to 360 million tomans (~US$8,500), more than 25 times the median monthly wage.
  • Prison terms of up to 10 years for repeat offenders or those who "promote nudity" online.
  • Confiscation of vehicles and mobile phones.
  • Travel bans, dismissal from public employment, and forfeiture of inheritance.
  • Liability for businesses that serve unveiled customers (sealed shops, withdrawn licences).

UN human-rights experts called it "gender apartheid" and warned that it amounted to a "crime against humanity of persecution".

The 2024 Noor Plan

On 13 April 2024, even before the bill's formal enactment, FARAJA launched the Noor ("Light") Plan — a nationwide street and surveillance campaign. CCTV with facial-recognition software is used to issue automatic violation notices to women whose number plates link them to unveiled appearances. See Morality Police.

Who is resisting?

Civil disobedience is widespread. Women appear unveiled in cafés, on the metro, at universities, and at concerts. Named cases include Roya Heshmati (74 lashes, January 2024), Sepideh Rashno (forced TV "confession", 2022), Mahsa Amini (killed in custody, September 2022), Armita Geravand (died after a reported assault by hijab enforcers, October 2023), and the activists of the White Wednesdays and My Stealthy Freedom movements founded by Masih Alinejad.

Key facts at a glance

  • Compulsory since: 1979 for state employees; codified for all women in public by parliament in 1983.
  • Governing article: Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code — 10 days to two months’ imprisonment or a fine for appearing without “religious hijab”.
  • Applies to: every woman over the age of nine in public, including foreign visitors and non-Muslims.
  • Enforcement body: the Guidance Patrol and, since April 2024, the camera-based Noor Plan.
  • Pending legislation: the Hijab and Chastity Bill, passed by parliament in September 2023, suspended rather than withdrawn since December 2024.
  • Status on the street: mass non-compliance in large cities since 2022; enforcement has shifted from arrest to fines, surveillance and exclusion from services.
Women burning headscarves at a rally against Iran’s compulsory hijab law.
Headscarf burning became the emblem of refusal after 2022. Inside Iran the equivalent act is simply walking uncovered through a city centre.

How compulsory hijab became law

The order arrived before the law did. On 7 March 1979, less than a month after the revolution, Khomeini said that women in government offices should appear covered. Six days of protest followed in Tehran, and the order was temporarily softened. It returned in stages: as a condition of employment, then as a rule for entering ministries and universities, then in 1983 as a criminal offence carrying up to 74 lashes. The current text, Article 638, dates from the 1996 revision of the penal code.

Legal milestones in Iran’s compulsory hijab regime.
DateMeasureEffect
7 March 1979Khomeini’s address on dress in government officesSix days of mass women’s protest in Tehran; order presented as advisory
July 1980Administrative order on government premisesUncovered women barred from ministries and public offices; dismissals begin
1983Parliamentary legislationCompulsory hijab in all public places; punishment of up to 74 lashes
1996Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code10 days to two months’ imprisonment or a fine; the operative provision today
2005–2006Creation of the Guidance PatrolDedicated street enforcement with vans and detention centres
September 2023Hijab and Chastity Bill passed by parliamentEscalating fines, up to 10 years for “organised” defiance, duties on businesses
13 April 2024Noor Plan launchedCamera identification, SMS warnings, car impoundment, business closures
December 2024Bill suspended by the Supreme National Security CouncilNot repealed; can be revived at any time

What the law actually requires

The statute does not define “religious hijab” in measurable terms, and that vagueness is functional: it transfers discretion to whoever is enforcing. In practice the working standard has been a headscarf covering all hair, a loose coat (manteau) reaching mid-thigh or below, full-length trousers or a skirt, and no visible make-up considered excessive. Additional restrictions apply in specific settings — the chador in some government buildings and hospitals, dark colours in schools, full compliance for foreign women visiting on any visa, and for girls from the age of nine in school and public life.

The penalty ladder in practice

Prison is now the least common outcome. Since 2024 the state has preferred penalties that leave no footage and no detainee to publicise.

Enforcement measures documented since the Noor Plan began, April 2024.
MeasureHow it is applied
SMS warningAutomated notice to the registered owner after camera identification of an uncovered woman in a vehicle
Vehicle impoundmentConfiscation for up to several weeks after repeat notices; hundreds of thousands of warnings reported in 2024
Business closureSealing of cafes, restaurants, pharmacies and clinics that serve uncovered customers
Denial of servicesRefusal at banks, government offices, airports and metro barriers
Employment and studyDismissal from public-sector work, suspension from university, barring from examinations
Fines and floggingCourt fines; corporal sentences still imposed, as in the 74 lashes carried out on Roya Heshmati in January 2024
ImprisonmentApplied to public figures, actresses, journalists and women who publish their defiance
Narges Mohammadi, Nobel Peace Prize laureate and Iranian human-rights defender.
Narges Mohammadi received the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize while imprisoned in Evin, where she has continued to document the treatment of women held for hijab offences.

Who refuses, and what it costs them

Refusal predates 2022. The Girls of Revolution Street protests began on 27 December 2017 when Vida Movahed stood on a utility box on Enghelab Street in Tehran and held her white headscarf on a stick; dozens of women repeated the act and received sentences of up to two years. After September 2022 the scale changed: uncovered women became ordinary in Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz and Rasht, and the state lost the ability to arrest its way out of the problem.

  • Vida Movahed — the first Girl of Revolution Street, December 2017; detained repeatedly since.
  • Sepideh Rashno — forced to confess on state television in 2022 after a bus confrontation over hijab.
  • Roya Heshmati — flogged 74 times in January 2024 and published her own account of it.
  • Ahou Daryaei — the student who stripped to her underwear at Azad University in Tehran in November 2024 after an enforcement encounter, and was taken to a psychiatric facility.
  • Actresses and athletes — travel bans, confiscated passports and criminal cases against women who appeared uncovered at public events or abroad.

How the law is treated internationally

The UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran concluded in March 2024 that the enforcement of compulsory hijab constitutes gender persecution, a crime against humanity, and that the state’s response to the 2022 protests amounted to widespread and systematic violations. The EU, UK, US and Canada have sanctioned the Guidance Patrol and named commanders. In 2022 Iran was removed from the UN Commission on the Status of Women by a vote of the Economic and Social Council — the first such removal in the commission’s history.

Frequently asked questions

Is hijab still compulsory in Iran in 2026?

Yes. Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code remains in force and enforcement continues through the Noor Plan. The Hijab and Chastity Bill, which would sharpen penalties further, was suspended in December 2024 but never repealed.

Does the law apply to tourists and non-Muslims?

Yes. Every woman in a public place in Iran, regardless of nationality or religion, is legally required to cover her hair and wear loose clothing. Airlines instruct passengers to comply before landing.

At what age does compulsory hijab begin?

Nine, the age of legal majority for girls under Iranian law, which is also when school uniform requirements apply.

What is the Noor Plan?

A nationwide enforcement programme launched on 13 April 2024 that combines renewed street patrols with camera identification, automated SMS warnings, vehicle impoundment and the closure of businesses that serve uncovered customers.

What is the Hijab and Chastity Bill?

Legislation passed by parliament in September 2023 providing escalating fines, prison terms of up to ten years for “organised” non-compliance and reporting duties for business owners. It was suspended in December 2024 after warnings that enacting it could trigger renewed unrest.

Has the law been declared a crime against humanity?

The UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran found in March 2024 that Iran's enforcement of compulsory hijab amounts to gender persecution, which is listed as a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute.

Verified record

How many were killed, and how

A dated casualty tracker, the roster of documented public hangings, and the record of the strikes on the Islamic Republic — all sourced and updated.

Open the death toll tracker

Reading the legal record: statute, legislation and enforcement

Approval, entry into force and suspension are different steps

The history of compulsory hijab includes both existing penal provisions and later attempts to strengthen enforcement. A bill can pass one legislative stage without becoming operative law. Approval, publication, entry into force and suspension describe different steps, and a summary should not collapse them into the word enacted.

The page's account of the additional Hijab and Chastity legislation records suspension before implementation. That distinction should remain attached to descriptions of its proposed or approved penalties. Those penalties should not be presented as identical to the operative penal provision, nor should suspension be confused with the abolition of compulsory hijab.

Read the enforcement-body background

Historical resistance belongs beside the legal chronology

Iranian women's protest against the compulsory hijab, 5 July 1980, published in Jomhouri-e Eslami newspaper (01)
Women protesting compulsory hijab on 5 July 1980, published in Jomhouri-e Eslami newspaper. Historical photograph, not current enforcement footage. Jomhouri-e Eslami newspaper · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons

Resistance to compulsory veiling did not begin with the 2022 uprising. The historical material on this page shows the earlier contest over public dress rules and the later stages of legal enforcement. Contemporary and historical sources need their own dates so that different episodes remain distinguishable.

The newspaper image below records a protest against compulsory hijab on 5 July 1980. It illustrates that specific historical episode, not present-day police practice. The photograph is useful precisely because its publication context is identified: it connects the legal timeline with a documented public response rather than offering an undated illustration of women in Iran.

Follow the wider historical chronology

An enforcement measure needs its own evidence

Street detention, a vehicle warning, impoundment, business closure and a criminal sentence are different actions. Evidence for one does not establish the prevalence of all the others. Reports should identify the responsible agency, date, location and legal or administrative basis where those details are available.

The same applies to surveillance technology. A reported use of cameras or automated notices should not be expanded into a claim about a specific identification system without supporting documentation. Describing what a source actually observed is more reliable than assuming the technical mechanism behind every enforcement notice.

Review the source guide

A rights finding is not the same as a criminal conviction

UN investigations and expert statements assess patterns of violations and their legal significance. They should be quoted with their exact author, mandate and scope. A finding about persecution or a systematic pattern does not mean a domestic statute itself has been convicted of a crime, nor does it establish the criminal liability of every official involved in enforcement.

Individual cases still require separate evidence about detention, treatment and outcome. The Mahsa Amini page and the memorial records supply that human context. Reading the legal and individual records together helps preserve both the broad pattern and the precise facts, rather than using a general legal description to settle every disputed incident.

Read the case behind the 2022 uprising

Understand the distinction between findings and allegations

Take action

Three emails that reach the people who decide

Ready-made advocacy tools from the Iranian diaspora: write to MEPs about a named detainee, demand the expulsion of Islamic Republic ambassadors, and press the UK to proscribe the IRGC. Each takes about two minutes.

Open the campaigns

All questions about Iran, answered

Every sourced question and answer on this archive, gathered on one page. Short answers first, with a link to the full page behind each one.

Mahsa Amini, hijab law and Woman Life Freedom →

Open the full FAQ hub →